“Get Out of My Land” Insists Developer to Residents of 40 Years

19 Sept 2017

 

Property developer Ehsan Bina has filed a new case against the residents of a village at Padang Jawa in Klang, alleging that they are illegally occupying the company’s land.

This is after the firm failed to get a court order to evict the villagers, as its petition for leave was denied by the Federal Court on 7 March 2017.

In a new case filed in May, Ehsan Bina’s Director Koi Chor Koon insists that the company legally purchased the land currently occupied by the village in 2012. It also identified 20 villagers as defendants in its latest suit, along with other unnamed individuals.

However, High Court Judicial Commissioner Roslan A Bakar instructed the developer to specify all of the defendants. As such, he has set another case management on 9 October so the company can get the names these persons as well as the supporting documents proving that it has obtained the consent of five villagers.

However, 15 of the 20 defendants are challenging the consent.

“The court should not allow for a consent if there was no clarity on the names and the consent was also disputed,” said Dinesh Muttal, an attorney resenting the 15 villagers.

According to the villagers’ representative Azman Mohd Taib, they have lived in the disputed land for more than four decades.

“The developer had previously coerced some villagers to sign an agreement that they will move out and they would only get RM7,000 as compensation. I did not sign the so-called agreement as I am not afraid and do not agree to the terms.”

Previously, Azman and the villagers filed a report with the cops, claiming that Ehsan Bina personnel were harassing them to force them to move out of their homes.

 

Image sourced from FMT.

 

This article was edited by the editorial team of PropertyGuru. To contact them about this or other stories email editorialteam@propertyguru.com.my

 

For the latest property news, trends, resources and expert opinions, visit our Property News section. Home buyers, sellers or property renters looking for Malaysian Properties, may like to visit the New Launches or Project Reviews page.

Gursharan Singh
Sep 19, 2017
If Klang restaurant owner with TOL can claim right to continued stay after about a decade then why are these poor not allowed to stay after having been there for four decades? What is the difference? Is it because Klang case is State land and this one privately owned land.
POST COMMENT

You may also like these articles

Arrogant Property Billionaire with Mexican Model Wife and 30 Rolls Royce in Hot Soup Over Bad Debts

 Hong Kong billionaire and property investor Stephen Hung has suffered a reversal of fortune and is now in desperate need of cash, with his total debt ballooning to HK$4.5 billion (RM2.43 billion

Continue Reading14 Sept 2017

Amidst Upcoming Elections, More Promises are Made

  In a bid to address parking space woes, the Federal Territories Ministry mulls having automated multi-storey car parks at People's Housing Projects (PPR) in Kuala Lumpur.In fact, a Kuala Lumpur Cit

Continue Reading12 Sept 2017

Fourth IKEA in Malaysia. Location: Penang

  Swedish furniture giant IKEA started the construction of its fourth store in Malaysia, with the outlet in Batu Kawan, Penang targeted for completion by early-2019.“It will be easy for millions of

Continue Reading14 Sept 2017